lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Law11-OE67ZXLsGmUpd00004c5c@hotmail.com>
From: se_cur_ity at hotmail.com (morning_wood)
Subject: New Microsoft Internet Explorer mshtml.dll Denial of Service?

> > I believe that for infosec stuffs, the faster information being
> > distributed/sent is the better. Late putting patch just because the
> > information come almost 1 hour later after it is sent might be
> > catastropic.
> 
> I don't know about catastrophic, but it certainly should be faster.  I
> personally find the speed of this list unacceptable.  For large lists
> with high volume, a list server written in a scripting language like
> python isn't going to cut it, IMHO.  I vote for qmail w/ ezmlm(-idx).
> (That is, if we get a vote in the matter.)

funny, i often see replies to my post long before i see my own post
dont know why, does'nt always happen. But it is odd.
Sometimes I wonder if the list is being siphoned for breaking sec info before
the posts reach the subscribers.

Donnie Werner
http://e2-labs.com 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ