[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A486476CDD336846B0A4FA6691413388026AF7@mseexp01.americas.cpqcorp.net>
From: jeff.t.parker at hp.com (Parker, Jeff (MSE))
Subject: Re: [tool] the new p0f 2.0.1 is now out
Umer,
Running p0f does not necessarily offer a stimulus/response test.
Regarding detecting a machine with p0f installed/running, you may have
better success simply trying to detect for any network adapter in
promiscuous mode. And there's tons of info available on that...
HTH,
-jeff parker
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of thetic
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:20 PM
To: Michal Zalewski; honeypots@...urityfocus.com;
pen-test@...urityfocus.com; focus-ids@...urityfocus.com;
sectools@...urityfocus.com
Cc: incidents@...urityfocus.com; bugtraq@...urityfocus.com;
full-disclosure@...sys.com
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [tool] the new p0f 2.0.1 is now out
Question concerning the the POF, how can we setup a IDS to detect a POF
scan.
umer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists