[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200309081713.h88HDLwD003077@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: EULA
On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 08:43:14 PDT, D B <geggam692000@...oo.com> said:
> does the EULA of microsoft violate lawyer client
> privilege ..... as in if my lawyer is using windows
> is he violating my rights
I can't speak for the legal profession, but the SP3 EULA (the one where you agree to
allow Microsoft to install, without warning or notification, anything labelled a "security
patch", even if it breaks 3rd party software), is known to be very bad mojo for sites
covered by HIPPA, because it cedes software change control.
Of course, if you fail to agree to the EULA and you're a HIPPA site, you're still screwed
because then you can't install post-SP3 patches.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030908/b38caae3/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists