[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11332-96253@sneakemail.com>
From: l8km7gr02 at sneakemail.com (l8km7gr02@...akemail.com)
Subject: 9/11 virus
Have these sorts of articles *ever* done any good?
"The 9/11 virus contains the headline "It's Near 911" or a similar
variation, as well as an attachment labeled "911.jpg." Users should not
open the e-mail or the attached file."
Coaching like this gives precisely the wrong message -- 'Don't open this
specific e-mail or try and view this specific attachment and you'll be
fine!'
Of course, users who regularly send and receive joke/cute file
attachments hardly benefit from the 'Don't open unexpected attachments!'
admonishment.
Add the inevitable batch of new 9/11 viruses to the heap of
avoidable-but-commonplace user-dependent vulnerabilities.
Cael
-------- Original Message --------
> Here we go again.. :P
>
> http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2003/0904firstofpe.html
>
> By Dan Verton
> Computerworld
> 09/04/03
>
> Antivirus researchers late Wednesday discovered what is being described
> as the first of potentially many "9/11" anniversary viruses spreading on
> the Internet...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists