full-disclosure - Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6E4A626CCE3C664F81F478A3674A40F8019D2280@epimetheus.adone.com>
From: JThomas at poweronemedia.com (Joshua Thomas)
Subject: Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft

> Second, Microsoft does have a right to implement security features to
> protect their network from attack (even if the threat was 
> created by their own incompetence).

Next you'll tell us it's OK for them to patch our servers without our
permission?

To protect the internet from ourselves?

The argument wears thin, and I do not buy it. 

No system should upgrade or patch itself without the user/administrator's
express consent. Even "you are denied access until you upgrade -- here's how
to do so" would be preferable.

Joshua Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030911/5c523a57/attachment.html