[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871080DEC5874D41B4E3AFC5C400611E06B476D4@UTDEVS02.campus.ad.utdallas.edu>
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Schmehl, Paul L)
Subject: RPC scanners
My $0.02.
The MS scanner covers a /16 in about two hours. It *will* report Win9x
machines as vulnerable, but that's a price I'm willing to pay.
Unfortunately it gives you an IP list with no indication of what is
wrong with the box. (Is it missing both 026 & 039? Just 039?) But it
allows you to script things that can help automate remediation
processes.
The eEye scanner works very well, but it limits you to a /24, which is a
bit of a pain. We use it for monitoring the worst offenders (VLANS, not
people.)
The Foundstone scanner? Well, I started scanning the /16 last night
around 6PM. It's at 62582 addresses right now, so I suppose it will
finish some time today. Not good. I was surprised, because their SQL
scanner is very fast. It covers a /16 in about an hour. Don't know
what the problem is, but something is definitely wrong.
I haven't tried any other scanners. I'll stick with the MS and eEye
scanners.
Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists