[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3F67BB5D.27264.A03662B@localhost>
From: nick at virus-l.demon.co.uk (Nick FitzGerald)
Subject: Blocking Music Sharing.
"Johnson, Mark" <mjohnson@...r.com> wrote:
> Due to the legal issues, I am trying to block access to sites like Kazaa
> and Limewire in the office. If I am not mistaken, these networks can
> use different ports each time, so there is no way to block it at the
> firewall. Is this right? And if so, what is the best way to block
> access to these types of sites?
You seem to be making the mistake of asking a "how do we detect X is
happening?" question when it sounds as if you really want the "how do
we prevent X from happening?" solution.
As you seem to be aware, detection of such protocols is fairly
problematic. And, even though it is doable for some currently
interesting sub-set of all protocols you may find problematic, it is
unlikely that will always be the case.
A better solution is to approach it as a policy issue and have
enforcement of "allowable" software on the client machines. There are
very few products to help with such solutions for now. Conventionally
-- perhaps there is some natural bias in human thought processes that,
in such situations, strongly tends to the "wrong" approach being seen
as the "obvious" or "natural" one?? -- the products that are available
are designed to answer "how do we detect...?" style questions.
Anyway, products that can monitor (and preferably detect but prevent)
the execution of non-sanctioned programs should then feed into an HR
policy about the use of non-sanctioned software on your corporate PCs
with suitable disincentives attached -- loss of bonuses or other
performance payments, "black marks" in the promotion ladder, formal
warnings, etc.
--
Nick FitzGerald
Computer Virus Consulting Ltd.
Ph/FAX: +64 3 3529854
Powered by blists - more mailing lists