full-disclosure - Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0309171417540.10854@meatpuppet>
From: devon at meatpuppet.lithiumnode.com (Person)
Subject: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c

It astounds me that so many people on this list (well, two) use the full
disclosure ethic as an excuse to oblige programmers to give up our privacy
rights and divulge all their code to a group of strangers.

Can you *seriously* not see the problem with someone taking credit for
someone else's work?  That is just exquisite bullshit, regardless of the
nature of the code itself, or with whom it was initially shared.

Tobias was right on the money to take issue with this, and some of you
need to back off and let talented hackers claim a little due credit and
take pride in their work once in a while.

[t]

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Brown, Rodrick wrote:

> Sour grapes next time release it to all or keep it to your self.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Ferris,
> Robin
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:54 PM
> To: Full-Disclosure
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c
>
> Rox on!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cael Abal [mailto:lists@...you.com]
> Sent: 17 September 2003 16:46
> To: Full-Disclosure
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c
>
>
> > frew min ago i was browsing packetstorm and i cant belive my eyes
> > anyone has changed a half haeder of my code and disclosures it to
> > packetstorm
> >
> > i cant understand why pplz does that
> > are they not able to got there own skills
> > i have investigate many hours to write this code and it should never
> > released
> > but some sucker leaked it and some other gay changes the half haeder
> and
> > disclosures it
> >
> > attached is the ORGINAL EXPLOIT code i wrote months ago
>
> /me blinks
>
> That's so unethical of them!!!
>
> Unfortunately, we have only your word as proof that you were the first
> to exploit the xlog off-by-one.  Next time, be the first one to
> publically release your exploit to Full-Disclosure, that way you'll be
> sure to get credit!
>
> Good luck!
>
> Cael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>