full-disclosure - Re: [RHSA-2003:279-01] Updated OpenSSH packages fix potential vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <007601c37d88$5594df70$8f04d882@bzdrnja>
From: Bojan.Zdrnja at LSS.hr (Bojan Zdrnja)
Subject: Re: [RHSA-2003:279-01] Updated OpenSSH packages fix potential vulnerability


> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com 
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of 
> Brown, Rodrick
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 September 2003 11:31 p.m.
> To: Matt Collins; kernelclue@...hmail.com
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: [RHSA-2003:279-01] Updated 
> OpenSSH packages fix potential vulnerability
> 
> 
> I tend to agree with the author the vendor spamming is 
> getting ridiclous 90% of there users dont even read 
> securitylists, and its very redundant and silly to have 6 to 
> 10 vendors spam mailinglists with patches to a exploited 
> application we have been discussing for months. 
>  
> I dont see why most moderators dont ban emails like this, if 
> your users want to be notified of new patches they should 
> join security@...dor.com 

I really don't see why most users that complain about this just don't setup
a filter which will automatically delete message with a particular subject.

Procmail is your friend, I don't see any reason of this thread.

Regards,

Bojan