full-disclosure - AW: Re: [RHSA-2003:279-01] Updated OpenSSH pack ages fix potential vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DF79BE12AF8DD344B107D0D03621E5750EDA2A@kermit.corp.hansenet.com>
From: vogt at hansenet.com (vogt@...senet.com)
Subject: AW: Re: [RHSA-2003:279-01] Updated OpenSSH pack
	ages fix potential vulnerability

>  Various vendors posting to Bugtraq and FD are a good thing IMHO. It's
just
> like replies to a broadcast icmp echo request. Vendors that keep answering
> with reasonnable latency can be trusted. Vendors that only replies to
their
> private network can't be fully trusted by other people. Vendors that don't
> answer can't be trusted at all.

Yes, but maybe we could ask them to use some kind of agreed-upon tag in
the subject lines, so all of the "updated package" announcements can be
filtered into their own folder easily?

That way, we can all be happy.


Tom Vogt