full-disclosure - new ssh exploit?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20030918210411.GU66001@sentex.net>
From: damian at sentex.net (Damian Gerow)
Subject: new ssh exploit?

Thus spake Bennett Todd (bet@...ul.net) [18/09/03 16:19]:
> Fair call. I didn't try 1.4. Just did, it crashed the same way; but
> it would have been more responsible on my part if I'd done that test
> before saying anything.

Then I'll concede, and say that lsh isn't as stable as it should be.

> bugs lists are different, developers who care don't throw any
> barriers in the way of people submitting bug reports. Bayesian
> filtering makes spam disappear, the problem is overrated:-).

I was wondering why they only have the one list.  There's only bugs, no
discussion, no development.  Odd...