[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3F6B26BA.3020909@well.com>
From: caferace at well.com (J. Race)
Subject: Web counter in the new Swen/Gibe.F worm
The counter wasn't necessarily a good indication of infected hosts. Who
knows what they started it as? Seeing as how it wasn't that hard to
find, it could have been a low-grade publicity stunt. It could have been
done in a far more stealthy manner.
-jim
security@...arr4.dnsalias.net wrote:
> It's a shame the counter was replaced, this gave us a good idea of how
> many hosts were infected and could reveal real numbers of the rate of
> infection - I'm still recieving these emails, over 100 overnight.
>
> Maybe the admins of vutbr.cz would open their web logs to give us more
> accurate information about the point of origin and rate of spread.
>
> If anyone wants the numbers I collected (I have data from the 18th at
> 13:56 through 4:30am today) I'd be happy to provide them.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists