full-disclosure - New port 901 scans?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Law11-OE57bS3JH47R600001c0e@hotmail.com>
From: se_cur_ity at hotmail.com (morning_wood)
Subject: New port 901 scans?

this is a fxing joke "http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?date=2003-06-04"

netdevil is authored by nilez, and is not "new" by any means.
the standard packer is "upx" and no updates are planned
why cant they get thier info straight *sigh*

if any one wants a uncompressed server or a totaly undetected version of the
server for testing i may be willing to provide info for forensics.
features are notification by cgi, mail and ICQ ( broke )
includes offline keylogging and webcam features.

Donnie Werner
CTO e2-labs.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Pavlakis" <john@...lakis.net>
To: "J. Race" <caferace@...l.com>
Cc: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] New port 901 scans?

> http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?date=2003-06-04
>
>
>
> > I'm seeing an increase in port 901 scans this morning starting a little
> > over 3 hours ago, all from individual IP's outside my netblock
> > originating from random ports.

>