[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <121344167576.20030921212114@lf.lv>
From: newsgroups at lf.lv (Peteris Krumins)
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Re: Snort and SourceFire "Backdoored"
Sunday, September 21, 2003, 6:24:54 PM, you wrote:
B> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:22:03AM -0700, joeypork@...hmail.com wrote:
>> I guess now that we have this incident validated as positively true from
>> the main Snort/SourceFire IT person, it lends a lot of credibility to
>> the Snort/SourceFire "backdoor" rumor.
B> No, it does not. Did you read my email?
B> I said this was OLD news. A LONG time ago. We published our findings on
B> snort.org a LONG time ago. Your assumptions are all wrong.
B> Grow up already.
#phrack@...et
<xxx> I think stating that you've been owned for years makes one look even more
incompetent. Because let's face it..if they weren't able to catch atleast
a dozen remotely exploitable bugs in snort in their regular audits, who's
to say they'd catch any so-called "backdooring"
It must have really been long time ago:
-rw-r--r-- 1 bmc bmc 199418 --- -- ---- snort-1.8.5-openbsd-3.0.pkg.tgz
-r--r--r-- 1 cmg cmg 1794602 --- -- ---- snort-20020129-1stable.src.rpm
P.Krumins
Powered by blists - more mailing lists