| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0309212133210.2474@cia.zemos.net> From: booger at unixclan.net (security snot) Subject: Increased port 135 activity If all internet traffic were filtered, idiots like you would have no useless statistics to quote, and if you did, no place to quote them. Not too long ago CERT reported increased scans for tcp 135, 139 and made the observation that there was likely to be increased exploitation of "anonymous shares" on Windows machines. How silly they looked when it turned out there were multiple exploits for Samba being distributed by dvdman, and mass exploitation of this service by every #vuln/#darknet hacker. "oh, something else runs on that port too!" - The Cert Pedophile (friend of KF) Anyhow, have a nice day. ----------------------------------------------------------- "Whitehat by day, booger at night - I'm the security snot." - CISSP / CCNA / A+ Certified - www.unixclan.net/~booger/ - ----------------------------------------------------------- On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Paul Tinsley wrote: > Does this bother anybody else? > > http://isc.incidents.org/port_details.html?port=135 > > Todays numbers are higher than what was seen with blaster (the green > peak on the 11th): > http://isc.incidents.org/port_details.html?port=135&repax=1&tarax=2&srcax=2&percent=N&days=70&Redraw= > > Maybe I am just being paranoid but this doesn't give me a good feeling... > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists