full-disclosure - Is Marty Lying?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0309230131470.17912@cia.zemos.net>
From: booger at unixclan.net (security snot)
Subject: Is Marty Lying?

For you, yes.

-----------------------------------------------------------
"Whitehat by day, booger at night - I'm the security snot."
- CISSP / CCNA / A+ Certified - www.unixclan.net/~booger/ -
-----------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Blue Boar wrote:

> security snot wrote:
> > The "code audit" that you guys did to make sure nothing was backdoored was
> > quite thorough too, considering since then remote bugs in Snort have been
> > published.  If you can't even spot the vulnerable code you introduce into
> > your source tree by accident, how can you definitively argue that no one
> > else snuck in subtle bugs that you also didn't catch?
>
> I'm sure it would have been extraordinarily difficult to run 'diff' on
> the codebase before the intrusion and the one after, to see if any of
> the changes weren't accounted for.
>
> 					BB
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>