full-disclosure - BugTraq Speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20030924203016.GA2467@radiohead>
From: abi at rubyforen.de (Michael Ablassmeier)
Subject: BugTraq Speed

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi Rainer,

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:39:27PM +0200, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> I wonder if someone else is sharing this experience? If so, one would be
> tempted to suspect that Symantec is deliberately delaying delivery, e.g.
> to give its premium customers a head start. There have been a lot of
> rumors recently, and this would fit in nicely...

i almost can share this experience with you. I've unsubscribed Bugraq a
few weeks ago, because i think, this list is better to discuss things, 
even if they are not <only> security related. I did not keep an eye on
every flaw which was reported, but sometimes, it seems indeed that f-d is 
more reliable (faster). Hm. This should not become an Bugraq vs. f-d
flame ;-)

bye,
    - michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/cf7YEFV7g4B8rCURAgZZAJ9VBSoHMxXx1lWNucy8afx+RAiZWwCgzUKo
u2kRZEvVASUXcM6f9J9v4gM=
=O3/G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----