full-disclosure - BugTraq Speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <928574116BD3784BBA6E7B0F017BA88A02FFB19C@SRVXCH10.LANPRD.NBB>
From: Max.Rapaille at nbb.be (Rapaille Max)
Subject: BugTraq Speed

I can confirm too.

For Example : Mail from Oliver Heinz (Arago.de) about Gauntlet firewall DOS :
Received 24 September at 16.01 (GMT-1) from Full-Disclosure  and received at 22.32 (GMT-1) from Bugtraq...

Or do I need to assume a voluntary delay from the author???  I doubt.

CHeers

Max

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Edlund [mailto:henrik@...und.org] 
> Sent: mercredi 24 septembre 2003 21:55
> To: Rainer Gerhards
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] BugTraq Speed
> Sensitivity: Private
> 
> 
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
> 
> RG> I wonder if someone else is sharing this experience? If 
> so, one would be
> RG> tempted to suspect that Symantec is deliberately delaying 
> delivery, e.g.
> 
> I can confirm a delay of 3-12 hours on BUGTRAQ compared to this list.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: NBB_Disclaimer.txt
Url: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030925/d72c5b17/NBB_Disclaimer.txt