full-disclosure - My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdot and the response by the CIPE list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20030925103103.GA8918@deneb.enyo.de>
From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
Subject: My response to both the analysis of CIPE by Gutmann, Slashdot and the response by the CIPE list

On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 12:08:57PM +0200, Michal Zalewski wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Florian Weimer wrote:
> 
> > Especially as some of the flaws (the replay attacks) are actually
> > documented in the manual.
> 
> And correct me if I am wrong, but it appears to me that replay attacks are
> not that much of a concern when encrypting TCP/IP packets?

The manual mentions replay attacks on CIPE management traffic, but I'm
not familiar enough with this aspect of the protocol to judge the
impact.