[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030925192205.31713.qmail@web10003.mail.yahoo.com>
From: bkporter at yahoo.com (Brian)
Subject: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windows
The increase in volume appears to coincide with
flashky's (xfocus.org) 9/20 post "The Analysis of RPC
Long Filename Heap Overflow AND a Way to Write
Universal Heap Overflow of Windows". Coincidence?
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams Jon
[mailto:WilliamsJonathan@...nDeere.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:01 AM
To: rnews@...er.com; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com;
incidents@...urityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windows
Since I've been watching for a new worm that uses the
MS03-039 vulnerability, when I saw this message, I
went over to incidents.org to check out and see if
they were seeing an increase, too. Lo and behold,
their charts for both TCP 135 and TCP 80 show dramatic
increases in traffic over the past few days. Port
135 is up from 377,000 targets on 9/20 to 1,900,000
targets on 9/23, and 80 is up from 880,000 records on
9/20 to 3,527,000 on 9/23. Despite this, I'm not
seeing anything else on the lists about a new worm.
Is anyone seeing anything new out there, or is this
just a resurgence of Welchia?
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Johnson
[mailto:rnews@...rlpool.river.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:03 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com;
incidents@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windows
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 14:41:39 -0600,
Richard Johnson <rdump@...er.com> wrote:
> We've noticed increased scan activity on port 135,
ramping up over the
> past 20 hours.
>
> The scanning appears to concentrate on nearby
/16s...
We finally had infections occur on Tuesday evening
showing the same
scan behavior. Sysadmins doing cleanup report Norton
and McAfee IDed
the bug as W32.Welchia.
I don't know whether it was a variant using one of the
two new RPC
holes, or just month-old Welchia. That's because the
hosts hit were
traditional non-compliant lab machines and
non-adminned remote office
or home hosts. In other words, they were still
vulnerable to the
original blaster worm.
The US Dept. of State's CLASS was hit by this one, and
it looks like
they shut down for a short while to contain it:
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0924ComputerVirus24-ON.html
Richard
--
To reply via email, make sure you don't enter the
whirlpool on river left.
My mailbox. My property. My personal space. My rules.
Deal with it.
http://www.river.com/users/share/cluetrain/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
=====
</> Brian Porter
</> PGP Public Key:
</> 0xE172E7B0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists