full-disclosure - RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <36402DCC1069D411922D00508B5B2CC21E3F2BB2@ex-server1.napier.ac.uk>
From: R.Ferris at napier.ac.uk (Ferris, Robin)
Subject: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo
	 ws

would it have been possable to actually replace these files manually and the
PC therefore be "patched" so to speak?

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Flynn [mailto:flynngn@....edu]
Sent: 26 September 2003 15:40
To: Ferris, Robin
Cc: 'full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com'
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for
Windo ws




Ferris, Robin wrote:

> I have not yet verified if the files were installed or not and thats a
very
> good point. I didnt and still dont know what files it changed or installed
> for the ms03-026. What are they?

MS03-026:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=823980


> However the eeye scanner has always proved to be correct thus far, in all
> the cases that I have tried it on. As we use a standard image here it
would
> be odd that the patch is "ineffective" in that configuration (PATH?) I
think
> it is because the patch as has been noted is not always effective. 

-- 
Gary Flynn
Security Engineer - Technical Services
James Madison University

Please R.U.N.S.A.F.E.
http://www.jmu.edu/computing/runsafe

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html