[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030927210324.GB22419@netpublishing.com>
From: ggilliss at netpublishing.com (Gregory A. Gilliss)
Subject: Incriminating innocent peer to peer network users
...and other than the fact that you sent this from a hushmail account, this
has *what* to do with security, exploits, vulnerabilities, etc?
I suggest alt.legal.rants =;^)
G
On or about 2003.09.27 04:07:29 +0000, auto93146@...h.com (auto93146@...h.com) said:
> There has been a disturbing trend recently whereby "authorities" in the
> United States of America have been filing lawsuits against peer to peer
> (P2P) network users for alleged copyright infringement. The lawsuits
> typically demand an outrageously large sum of money, such that the target
> P2P user settles out of court for a smaller amount of money. As a result,
> the quality of the authority's "evidence" is never called into question.
>
> I have written a paper that explores this issue by describing just some
> of the many ways in which a malicious P2P user can generate and manipulate
> "evidence" in order to implicate an innocent P2P user in behaviour deemed
> unacceptable to the authorities. The paper discusses basic issues (such
> as known issues with the architecture of P2P networks) as well as some
> more advanced issues (such as previously unknown vulnerabilities in P2P
> applications) that allow the creation and manipulation of "evidence"
> of unacceptable behaviour, questioning the ability for authorities to
> sue P2P network users.
>
> The paper can be found at the following URL:
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~123456789/p2p_entrapment.pdf
--
Gregory A. Gilliss, CISSP Telephone: 1 650 872 2420
Computer Engineering E-mail: greg@...liss.com
Computer Security ICQ: 123710561
Software Development WWW: http://www.gilliss.com/greg/
PGP Key fingerprint 2F 0B 70 AE 5F 8E 71 7A 2D 86 52 BA B7 83 D9 B4 14 0E 8C A3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists