full-disclosure - MSN Any better? (was: verisigns overflow?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <005a01c38b46$5cefd920$45f4ac41@k4h8f5>
From: anthony at safferconsulting.com (Anthony Saffer)
Subject: MSN Any better? (was: verisigns overflow?)

Being forwarded to MSN is different.
Verisign's SiteFinder actually effected the operation of the Internet.
Being forwarded to MSN doesn't.
YOU have a choice in the MSN case.
You didn't with SiteFinder.

Anthony Saffer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paulo Pereira" <pjp@...lo-pereira.net>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 3:52 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] MSN Any better? (was: verisigns overflow?)

> Why is it that beeing forwarded to MSN is any better?
> 
> http://search.msn.com/dnserror.aspx?FORM=DNSAS&q=bingonetpunk.com
> 
> Just because I have the option not to use Microsoft Explorer?