full-disclosure - Political Posts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200310052116.33874.adeon@o2.pl>
From: adeon at o2.pl (Adam Dyga)
Subject: Political Posts

Dnia nie 5. pa?dziernika 2003 18:50, J.A. Terranson napisa?:
| On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Eric Scher wrote:
| > I DID NOT SUBSCRIBE TO THIS LIST TO READ POLITICAL POSTS.
|
| Nobody gives a fuck what *you* signed up for.  Don't like it?  Get the fuck
| out.
|
| This is "Full Disclosure" - *Everything* is disclosed: favorite Presidents,
| latest 'sploits, Ice Cream recipies...  If you want a good S/N ratio, you
| are in the wrong fucking place.

It's from full-disclosure charter 
(http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html):

"Acceptable Content

Any information pertaining to vulnerabilities is acceptable, for instance 
announcement and discussion thereof, exploit techniques and code, related 
tools and papers, and other useful information.

Gratuitous advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is forbidden. 
Disagreements, flames, arguments, and off-topic discussion should be taken 
off-list wherever possible.

Humour is acceptable in moderation, providing it is inoffensive. POLITICS 
SHOULD BE AVOIDED AT ALL COSTS.

[...]"

So, didn't you read it before you subscribed? I think so...

-- 
Greets
adeon