full-disclosure - OT: Hamilton v. Microsoft lawsuit complaint is now online

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20031005093619.GL11988@sparky.finchhaven.net>
From: jsage at finchhaven.com (John Sage)
Subject: OT: Hamilton v. Microsoft lawsuit complaint is now online

Even at this very late date, I'm still compelled to say:

On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 12:16:26PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> Richard M. Smith wrote:
> 
> > I have posted a copy of the Hamilton v. Microsoft law 
> > suit complaint on my Web site:
> > 
> > http://www.computerbytesman.com/security/hamilton_v_microsoft_complaint.htm
> > 
> > This Reuters story provides background on this proposed 
> > class action lawsuit, which was filed today in Los Angeles, 
> > against Microsoft:
> > 
> >    Microsoft faces class action on security
> >    http://news.com.com/2100-1009-5085730.html?tag=nl
> 
> Quite offtopic. But what I still wonder is why the heck one
> isn't allowed to do business and become large.
> Is it all jealousy? If they where so bad why do they get
> the revenue and not your company producing super duper software?

/* snip */


Don't feed the trolls...




- John
-- 
"Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures."
-
John Sage; InfoSec Groupie
-
ABCD, EFGH, IJKL, EmEnOh, Pplus+, Mminus-
-
ATTENTION: this message is privileged communication. If you read it
even though you aren't supposed to, you're a poopy-head.