full-disclosure - Spam with PGP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1065559579.3182.15.camel@tantor.nuclearelephant.com>
From: jonathan at nuclearelephant.com (Jonathan A. Zdziarski)
Subject: Spam with PGP

So essentially you are agreeing with me; that heuristic-based filters
are obsolete.  This is evidenced by the fact that you're interested in
turning SA into more or less a Bayesian filter.

>From what others have told me, it looks like SA devel is actually going
in that direction too - which is good.  My only qualm now is that if SA
wants to be a Bayesian filter, go ahead and do it and get rid of all the
rulesets so they can focus their attention on enhancing the Bayesian.

On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 16:14, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:45:43PM -0400, Jonathan A. Zdziarski said:
> > percentage of the actual final score.  Because true Bayesian filtering
> > performs a huge majority of the same tests that SA performs, SA's own
> > ruleset easily waters down any bayesian findings whenever there are
> > opposing values between the two.  For example, a pine MUA...SA thinks a
> 
> Those values are fully configurable.  You're confusing obsolescent
> design with a PEBKAC.
>