[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200310081915.h98JFc2H010782@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Increased TCP 139 Activity
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 13:38:00 EDT, "Brown, Rodrick" <rbrown@...tt.nyc.gov> said:
> You must not be on a cable network I must get around a 100 probes a day
> when I'm home on port 139
Of course, if they've been averaging 100/day and are now seeing 3,000/hour,
that would be a "significant increase" as well. In fact, use of the term "increase"
implies that they have a handle on the baseline activity level, and that it's
noticably different.
For what it's worth, I'm still seeing "background chatter" rates here.
How many different sources was the original poster seeing probes from, and
how many sensors in how big an address range?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20031008/f373585d/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists