lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200310081915.h98JFc2H010782@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Increased TCP 139 Activity 

On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 13:38:00 EDT, "Brown, Rodrick" <rbrown@...tt.nyc.gov>  said:
> You must not be on a cable network I must get around a 100 probes a day
> when I'm home on port 139

Of course, if they've been averaging 100/day and are now seeing 3,000/hour,
that would be a "significant increase" as well.  In fact, use of the term "increase"
implies that they have a handle on the baseline activity level, and that it's
noticably different.

For what it's worth, I'm still seeing "background chatter" rates here.

How many different sources was the original poster seeing probes from, and
how many sensors in how big an address range?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20031008/f373585d/attachment.bin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ