[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20031012180138.79577.qmail@web20208.mail.yahoo.com>
From: visitbipin at yahoo.com (bipin gautam)
Subject: Local DoS in windows. [indeed it works... PROOF?]
[... see full disclosure mailing list for
discussion/details]
so i have to share the credit... cauz you use a
modulus of my trick to achive similar result!!!
[ well... take all the credit if you want...]
i just wanna say, see , i wasn't wrong...
ps! trust me i knew that, many of such similar thing's
is possiple <just don't wanna create a long list's of
CRAPS!] hell, there are lot of thing's....... EVEN IF
YOU HOLD SOME [SPECIALLY CRAFTED!] DIALOG BUTTONS OT
WILL SHOW SIMILAR ISSUE!!!
WELL, i can't still figure out... WHAT CUSES THE REAL
problem cauz i have been getting about equal positive
and negative responce from all around the globe!!!
-------------------------------------------------
--- Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 02:18:16 +0200, Richard Spiers
> <dksaarth@...x.za.net> said:
> > whoopee!. Bleh. Really a security issue? Same
> thing happens if you have show
> > windows content enabled and you drag around a
> window, as long as your
> > dragging the window, the cpu will remain close to
> 100 % usage. Significant?
>
> Probably not directly, but possibly indirectly.
>
> The questions are, of course:
>
> 1) Is the 100% cycle sucking done as a pre-emptible
> thing, or can you
> cpu-starve something else using it?
>
> 2) Is there some *other* security-related API that
> botches incorrectly if it's
> cpu-starved?
>
> > No, unless its proof of some shoddy coding of
> some-sort.
>
> A hammer is a useful tool for finding
> non-impact-resistant screws......
>
> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists