[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200310120105.h9C15T6s009453@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Local DoS in windows.
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 02:18:16 +0200, Richard Spiers <dksaarth@...x.za.net>
said:
> whoopee!. Bleh. Really a security issue? Same thing happens if you have
show
> windows content enabled and you drag around a window, as long as your
> dragging the window, the cpu will remain close to 100 % usage.
Significant?
Probably not directly, but possibly indirectly.
The questions are, of course:
1) Is the 100% cycle sucking done as a pre-emptible thing, or can you
cpu-starve something else using it?
2) Is there some *other* security-related API that botches incorrectly if
it's
cpu-starved?
> No, unless its proof of some shoddy coding of some-sort.
A hammer is a useful tool for finding non-impact-resistant screws......
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 2505 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20031011/a217160a/attachment-0001.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists