full-disclosure - Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200310152025.h9FKPt5H023966@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Supposed SaS "encryption" weak - Coments and Infor about wrong claims 

On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 02:35:27 EDT, KF <dotslash@...soft.com>  said:
> Heh watch out for that DMCA.

17 USC 1201 (a)(1)(A) says:

No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls
access to a work protected under this title. The prohibition contained in the
preceding sentence shall take effect at the end of the 2-year period beginning
on the date of the enactment of this chapter.

Note the word "effectively".  Also note that Adobe managed to make the case
that rot-13 was effective......
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20031015/77938b6a/attachment.bin