full-disclosure - AT&T early warning system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: sgmasood at yahoo.com (S G Masood)
Subject: AT&T early warning system

--- Hoho <hoho@...omeat.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 22:44, jkm wrote:
> > Quote 2:
> > "AT&T saw anomalies in its network three to four
> weeks before that worm
> > hit and was able to take certain precautions.
> "When the worm actually
> > happened, AT&T's network did not take a hit,''
> Eslambolchi said."
> 
> 
> Doesn't it seem like they're trying to violate
> causality? If the worm
> doesn't exist yet, then its associated traffic
> doesn't exist yet, hence
> there's nothing to detect.

...unless they had insider information that a worm
that exploits certain "anomalies" would be released in
"three to four weeks" :).
I didn't see the original article but maybe they are
referring to the DCOM worm brigade which was
anticipated and awaited weeks before it hit.

--
S.G.Masood
Hyderabad,
India.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com