full-disclosure - AT&T early warning system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20031018042509.708DD3EDC1@www.fastmail.fm>
From: jkmanowar9 at fastmail.fm (jkm)
Subject: AT&T early warning system

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:28:44 -0400 (EDT), "Jay Sulzberger"
<jays@...ix.com> said:
> 
> I am glad that a telephone company is working to bring the InterWeb under
> the same sort of statistical oversight as the telphone net was under
> circa
> 1950.
> 
> Even the crudest of old fashioned traffic analysis, and the most
> elementary
> precautions against massive channeled scabland packet flows would have
> stopped most of the recent worm annoyances.
> 
> oo--JS.

I'm interested in the technical aspect of it all. Is AT&T going to start
simple port blocking, or whatever I didn't think of, against worms which
might interfere with what legit ports that might be open. Would love to
know what they have in mind for this Internet Protect and its
implementation.
Ok, I've got to read up on what happened in the 1950s for the telephone
network since I wasn't even born then. :)
-- 
  jkm
  jkmanowar9@...tmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
                          unladen european swallow