full-disclosure - No Subject (re: openssh exploit code?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3F9586B4.1090207@thievco.com>
From: BlueBoar at thievco.com (Blue Boar)
Subject: No Subject (re: openssh exploit code?)

mitch_hurrison@...lip.com wrote:
> My main point being there is simply no
> need for the disclosure of exploits. 

English is a funny language.  Based on the rest of your note, I assume 
by "no need", you mean that there's no one forcing you to release your 
exploits, and you see no moral imperitive that says you should, yes?  Or 
do you also mean to say that there is "no need" on the part of others, 
by which I mean that you don't believe that other people can put 
exploits to legal, productive uses?

					BB