From: lorenzohgh at nsrg-security.com (Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro)
Subject: About eMule web server "Buffer Overflow" discovered vulnerability

sorry , i sent the message only to nathan, ;-)
here is it.
best regards.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro" <lorenzohgh@...g-security.com>
To: <nathan.grandbois@...dant.com>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] About eMule web server "Buffer Overflow"
discovered vulnerability


> Hi nathan,
> yeah , its many common to use in a bad context.
> many common when somebody talks about a thing that it's not known.
> ;-)
> FOR  ALL MEMBERS:
> is somebody going to stay in spanish SIMO TCI ??? ( like the 3 and other
> technology meetings )
> its really good except some stands:
> Microsoft -> The worst dj's of the world
>                      The spin cow shits
> .-SPANISH GOVERNMENT-.
>  MCIT ->
>                     The worst i+d help to little enterprises
>                     The worst services
>                     Pure liers about high band connections , they promise
> cheaper connections but they don't do nothing !!!
>
> Best regards to all,
> -------------------------------
> 0x00->Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro
> 0x01->\x74\x72\x75\x6c\x75\x78
> 0x02->The truth is out there,
> 0x03-> outside your mind .
> __________________________________
> PGP: Keyfingerprint
> 4ACC D892 05F9 74F1 F453  7D62 6B4E B53E 9180 5F5B
> ID: 0x91805F5B
> **********************************
> \x6e\x73\x72\x67
> \x73\x65\x63\x75\x72\x69\x74\x79
> \x72\x65\x73\x65\x61\x72\x63\x68
> http://www.nsrg-security.com
> ______________________
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Nathan" <nathan.grandbois@...dant.com>
> To: "'Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro'" <lorenzohgh@...g-security.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 6:51 PM
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] About eMule web server "Buffer Overflow"
> discovered vulnerability
>
>
> > I agree, people use it in the wrong context very often.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro
> > [mailto:lorenzohgh@...g-security.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:02 PM
> > To: nathan.grandbois@...dant.com
> > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] About eMule web server "Buffer Overflow"
> > discovered vulnerability
> >
> >
> > Thanks Nathan.
> > it seems a stupid expression xD
> > best regards,
> > -------------------------------
> > 0x00->Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro
> > 0x01->\x74\x72\x75\x6c\x75\x78
> > 0x02->The truth is out there,
> > 0x03-> outside your mind .
> > __________________________________
> > PGP: Keyfingerprint
> > 4ACC D892 05F9 74F1 F453  7D62 6B4E B53E 9180 5F5B
> > ID: 0x91805F5B
> > **********************************
> > \x6e\x73\x72\x67
> > \x73\x65\x63\x75\x72\x69\x74\x79
> > \x72\x65\x73\x65\x61\x72\x63\x68
> > http://www.nsrg-security.com
> > ______________________
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nathan" <nathan.grandbois@...dant.com>
> > To: "'Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro'" <lorenzohgh@...g-security.com>
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 6:04 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] About eMule web server "Buffer Overflow"
> > discovered vulnerability
> >
> >
> > > LOL=Laughing out Loud
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> > > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com]On Behalf Of Lorenzo
> > > Hernandez Garcia-Hierro
> > > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:13 AM
> > > To: Full-Disclosure
> > > Cc: BUGTRAQ
> > > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] About eMule web server "Buffer Overflow"
> > > discovered vulnerability
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi again,
> > > Umm , i've read in the website of my friend , 3APA3A , (
> > security.nnov.ru )
> > > a person discovered a supposed "Buffer Overflow" in the eMule
> > > webserver used for remote administration.
> > > It is not a Buffer Overflow , you don't corrupt the stack and then
> insert
> > > data to gain shell access or similar
> > > and definately it is not a non-remote exploitable buffer oveflow,
> > > it is only a typical Denial of Service attack against an incorrect
data
> > > handler with the only protection of the user side.
> > > So , if you read one of my past advisories you can see my advisory
about
> > > Sambar Server search.pl Buffer Overflow,
> > > it was wrong too xD , i was confused but long time passed since that
> > > advisory.
> > > Its common to confuse the DoS attacks and Buffer Overflows.
> > > NOTE: the search.pl script of sambar had the same problem , an
incorrect
> > > input data handler that allowed to make DoS attacks against
> > > the sambar webserver and the perl executable ( i wrote Buffer Overflow
> due
> > > to this , i didn't know if the perl executable could allow to
> > > corrupt the stack or similar ), so it was only a DoS , simple and
easy.
> > >
> > > Best regards to all,
> > > PS: can somebody tell me about the l0l experssion ? is it laughting on
> the
> > > loud ? xD a stupid question i know !
> > > -------------------------------
> > > 0x00->Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro
> > > 0x01->/* not csh but sh */
> > > 0x02->$ PATH=pretending!/usr/ucb/which sense
> > > 0x03-> no sense in pretending!
> > > __________________________________
> > > PGP: Keyfingerprint
> > > 4ACC D892 05F9 74F1 F453  7D62 6B4E B53E 9180 5F5B
> > > ID: 0x91805F5B
> > > **********************************
> > > No Secure Root Group Security Research Team
> > > http://www.nsrg-security.com
> > > ______________________
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists