[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.44.0310260056010.56866-100000@zivunix.uni-muenster.de>
From: schonef at uni-muenster.de (Marc Schoenefeld)
Subject: Java 1.4.2_02 InsecurityManager JVM crash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Java 2 Security Managers are objects that should enforce
system integrity and safety. Everyone would expect that
the provided base classes from the JDK are therefore a
role model for code quality and stability. But that's
all theory. Let's do some practice:
Imagine a lazy implementor (like me) of a SecurityManager,
he codes the following:
/* InsecurityManager-Demonstration */
/* coded by Marc Schoenefeld */
public class InSecurityManager extends SecurityManager {
public void doit() {
System.out.println("doit");
int o = classDepth(null);
}
public static void main(String[] a) {
InSecurityManager m = new InSecurityManager();
m.doit();
}
}
When you run the class with the command
java InSecurityManager
you get a jvm crash, instead of a null pointer exception.
I tested this with the latest 1.3.1,1.4.1,1.4.2 implementations.
All Sun implementations crash, the IBM 1.4.1 (comes with
Websphere or Cloudscape) is stable.
This sample of code will do no harm to productive environments,
because you cannot instantiate a second security manager, but
it may be a snapshot of the inner condition of jvm security.
Lesson learned: Do not believe white papers or specifications,
test the implementation and report bugs to the vendor. Choose
a stable implementation.
Sincerely
Marc Schoenefeld
- --
Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the
ark; professionals built the Titanic. -- Anonymous
Marc Sch?nefeld Dipl. Wirtsch.-Inf. / Software Developer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (AIX)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE/mwUxqCaQvrKNUNQRApt/AJ9uwaavBSTpMFa9vZ+BhwBDNxD8sACaA3DZ
E3sLSXijpoAjR1iOdC1FGPo=
=TYLu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists