[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20031029134638.GA16366@deneb.enyo.de>
From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
Subject: New variant of Nachi ?
Helmut Springer wrote:
> Has anyone seen any evidence besides this and the two postings on
> public lists? No real trace after more than 24h it seems...
We see increased scanning activity, but it doesn't look like a
widespread worm:
date | sources | targets | flows
------------+---------+---------+-------
2003-10-20 | 8058 | 10796 | 27206
2003-10-21 | 3331 | 5908 | 11425
2003-10-22 | 3660 | 7324 | 13989
2003-10-23 | 2137 | 3853 | 6885
2003-10-24 | 1459 | 3603 | 5505
2003-10-25 | 1743 | 5717 | 9193
2003-10-26 | 4248 | 5487 | 10954
2003-10-27 | 8117 | 10073 | 23920
2003-10-28 | 8463 | 10658 | 27231
2003-10-29 | 3651 | 5171 | 10898
(Date, number of distinct source addresses, number of distinct target
addresses, flows AKA connection attempts -- incoming packets only, and
and the 2003-10-29 row is still increasing, of course.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists