[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3FA68D47.6237.E1141A1@localhost>
From: nick at virus-l.demon.co.uk (Nick FitzGerald)
Subject: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good
security
For all his usual intelligence, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu oddly felt the
need to ad:
> And for bonus points, explain how you fix the scheme so the poor sysadmin who
> has to run stuff at startup is able to find the folder, but an exploit running
> with 'administrator' or 'system' can't find it?
Re-read what I wrote.
I explained all that.
Like all security efforts, it is not a "perfect" solution.
It also does not work against all methods of exploitation or in all
cases of exploitation using any given method.
However, it would have saved you from a bunch of once common IE
exploits and will still save you from a huge amount of "work" done by
thousands of next-to-clueless skiddies who take overly simple PoC
exploits and are limited to altering them to simply gluing in the
delivery of their preferred RAT/bot-net agent/etc.
As I already explained all that _and_ answered your question before you
asked it, I gladly accept your bonus points...
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
Powered by blists - more mailing lists