[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <182DB8D8-0E47-11D8-BB23-000393779ABA@sackheads.org>
From: cerebus at sackheads.org (Timothy J.Miller)
Subject: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning
On Nov 3, 2003, at 2:22 PM, Jonathan A. Zdziarski wrote:
> To answer your question:
>
> Debian: 8 CDs of useless or outdated software, 2.2 kernel install,
> poorly designed install tool
ObPickNits:
Debian only needs one CD, if you have a network connection. In fact,
there's a 'netinst' Debian install CD that can be burned to a business
card CDROM.
Debian maintains security fixes for all stable packages, so none are
really outdated. Interested people maintain 'backports' of important
packages if a major package releases between Debian releases. Finally,
if you *must* have the "version released yesterday," you can install
Debian stable and 'apt-get dist-upgrade' to Debian testing or Debian
unstable, which usually work just fine.
Debian 3.0 CD3 uses a 2.4.18 boot kernel, so you can install under 2.4.
Regardless of which kernel you install, Debian stable maintains kernel
packages for 2.4.16 & 18, and the 'make-kpkg' tool makes it trivial to
compile and install your own kernel package from a later revision
kernel source.
Finally, if "poorly designed" means you actually have to read the
install prompts, then yes, I think you're probably right. However, the
neophyte I gave an install CD last week didn't have a problem, so that
issue is overblown.
-- Cerebus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists