lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200311031846.01131.capegeo@opengroup.org>
From: capegeo at opengroup.org (George Capehart)
Subject: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security

On Monday 03 November 2003 06:22 pm, Geoincidents wrote:
> > Apparently the folks at Microsoft aren't there yet . . . would
> > *you* be willing to expose a stored procedure in a SQL Server
> > database as a Web service?  See
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/33718.html.  The inmates
> > are running the loony bin . . .
>
> Of course not, but then isn't that the point, to run this stuff on
> the internet without leaving it "exposed"?

But IMHO, that *is* the point.  If it's on the Internet, it's exposed . 
. . And if a stored procedure is exposed, then the whole system is 
exposed . . . The following URL (may wrap) points to what *Microsoft* 
has to say about Web services security.  Now, imagine what a "secure" 
stored procedure must look like . . .

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwssecur/html/securitywhitepaper.asp

/g


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ