[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200311031846.01131.capegeo@opengroup.org>
From: capegeo at opengroup.org (George Capehart)
Subject: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security
On Monday 03 November 2003 06:22 pm, Geoincidents wrote:
> > Apparently the folks at Microsoft aren't there yet . . . would
> > *you* be willing to expose a stored procedure in a SQL Server
> > database as a Web service? See
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/33718.html. The inmates
> > are running the loony bin . . .
>
> Of course not, but then isn't that the point, to run this stuff on
> the internet without leaving it "exposed"?
But IMHO, that *is* the point. If it's on the Internet, it's exposed .
. . And if a stored procedure is exposed, then the whole system is
exposed . . . The following URL (may wrap) points to what *Microsoft*
has to say about Web services security. Now, imagine what a "secure"
stored procedure must look like . . .
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwssecur/html/securitywhitepaper.asp
/g
Powered by blists - more mailing lists