[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <347405522.1067906859@[192.168.2.119]>
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Paul Schmehl)
Subject: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and
transition planning
--On Monday, November 03, 2003 6:55 PM -0700 Michael Gale
<michael@...esuperman.com> wrote:
>
> RH is, oh wait - was linux's version of windows, a pain in the a$$.
> People who started off on RH usually never learned anything and are stuck
> with the same problems as windows has except for less crashing.
>
> Modifying things is a pain because there are 50 millions different places
> that RH keeps the data and you can't do anything from the console so you
> get stuck using the GUI they provide.
>
I hate OS wars, but I find this statement extremely odd. I run a RH 7.2
server on the Internet, and it's 50 miles away. It doesn't have a
keyboard, mouse or monitor, and X and its pieces aren't even installed.
It's been sitting there running for about two years now, and I haven't had
one single problem doing things "from the console", nor have I had a
problem with updates, even kernel patches. I just reboot the box and log
back in a minute later, after it's rebooted.
Obviously, OSes are a matter of taste for many. I personally prefer
FreeBSD. But my experience with RedHat has been dramatically different
than what you claim. It's easy to use, easy to update, easy to maintain,
and it's run without a hitch, handling 2.6 millions hits a month on the
website without breaking a sweat.
Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists