| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20031110103817.GO27869@sensei.nu> From: sensei at sensei.nu (Kenneth Ekdahl) Subject: Feeding Stray Cats One way to solve this could be to split this list into two; one moderated and one un-moderated. All mail gets sent to the un-moderated list, to avoid the suspicions of censorship that makes this list different from bugtraq, and those mail that pass moderation, or is sent from someone who is known from previous posts to be serious, will also be sent to the moderated list. That way anybody i able to choose between two levels of noise. Just like open source software is often more secure, not because everybody reads all the source code, but everybody knows that many who really are interested in security issues reads the source, and will report any problems. The same goes for my idea above, no-one has to read the un-moderated list, but everybody has the chance to do it. Just my two cents (SEK 0.16) -- /~\ The ASCII Kenneth Ekdahl \ / Ribbon Campaign sensei@...n.org X Against HTML sensei@...sei.nu / \ Email! http://sensei.nu http://merit.sensei.nu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists