lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: chill at (Charles E. Hill)
Subject: [RHSA-2003:323-01] Updated Ethereal packages fix security issues

On Monday 10 November 2003 09:55, wrote:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>                    Red Hat Security Advisory
> Synopsis:          Updated Ethereal packages fix security issues
> Advisory ID:       RHSA-2003:323-01
> Issue date:        2003-11-10
> Updated on:        2003-11-10
> Product:           Red Hat Linux
> Keywords:          ethereal SOCKS buffer overflow
> Cross references:
> Obsoletes:         RHSA-2003:203
> CVE Names:         CAN-2003-0925 CAN-2003-0926 CAN-2003-0927


Hmmm... two copies of this floated across the list.

One of them was listed as "GOOD, BUT UNTRUSTED" by my GPG setup, however the 
other was listed as "THIS SIGNATURE IS BAD".  Anyone else get this this?  Is 
this normal?  I don't usually see red -- bad signatures -- on the warnings.

Charles E. Hill
Technical Director
Herber-Hill LLC

Powered by blists - more mailing lists