lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: hescominsoon at adelphia.net (William Warren)
Subject: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux
 ]

again many folks forget that Red Hat is not Linux..only the linux kernel 
is linux..the rest are third party apps..so if you really want apples to 
apples..then take MS and their(ie is critical to the os and therefore 
part of the OS therefore making it native to the kernel) and the Linux 
kernel and check vunls..windows will be many orders of magnitude 
worse..apples to apples that is..:)

KF wrote:

> good lord... is this a joke? They compare windows 2003 server to redhat 
> 6.0! Thats pretty damn close to apples and oranges. How about NT4.0 to 
> RH6.... thats a more level playing field? Even 2k3 vs. RH9 would be a 
> bit more on point. I fail to see how you can compare software that is 5 
> years old to something that was just released.
> 
> "there were 17 critical vulnerabilities. For Windows Server 2003, there 
> were four. For Red Hat Linux 6, they were five to ten times higher."
> 
> -KF
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 

-- 
May God Bless you and everything you touch.

My "foundation" verse:
Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and 
every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt 
condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their 
righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists