full-disclosure - Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200311121348.38189.jeremiah@nur.net>
From: jeremiah at nur.net (Jeremiah Cornelius)
Subject: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 12 November 2003 10:33, Georgi Guninski wrote:
<SNIP>

> A user told me: "Yesterday i bought a computer. played the windows game all
> day long, but couldn't win once [1]"

Here's a recent bit from Doc "Cluetrain" Searles along these lines.  It is in 
response to the Novell acquisition of SuSE, but outlines very succinctly 
those things represented by Linux/Apache/etc. that are outside the scope or 
interest of MS or /any/ vendor.

http://www.ssc.com/pipermail/suitwatch/2003-November/000058.html

|   Linux isn't a vendor product. Never was, never will be. It's not even
|   a product. It's a project by a development community that includes
|   many vendors but isn't driven by any of them. Same goes for other
|   members of the LAMP suite, with the single exception of MySQL, which
|   owns the code (making it, in that sense, proprietary) but locates
|   development squarely inside the community rather than in its own
|   corporate container. In other words, they are very			
|   unvendor-like--market-compliant, I'd say.
|
|  Development communities like Linux's grew out of the need to do what|
|   vendors couldn't do or wouldn't do. That doesn't make vendors bad or
|   anything; it just puts them in perspective. They can't do everything,
|   and now they don't have to.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/sqqpJi2cv3XsiSARAtn5AKCoLUDQYrAceya4+lSAt2/T8PL72wCfUAXa
vyO+zknoQ7PwLRDbsvSdvrI=
=HL+P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----