lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0311121657390.4530-100000@tundra.winternet.com>
From: dufresne at winternet.com (Ron DuFresne)
Subject: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux
 ]

What's really interesting is how red-hat a week prior took steps to
distance itself as competeing with M$, almost like they had a clue in
advance this crap was going to fly.  And of course, it's logical for M$ to
go right to the throat of RH, afterall, they are the main game in trying
to make a buck off what is for all intents and purposes freely available
OS/SW.  Bring RH to it's knees with trying to debunk FUD from M$ and they
end up withgout ever competing against opensource.

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, William Warren wrote:

> again many folks forget that Red Hat is not Linux..only the linux kernel
> is linux..the rest are third party apps..so if you really want apples to
> apples..then take MS and their(ie is critical to the os and therefore
> part of the OS therefore making it native to the kernel) and the Linux
> kernel and check vunls..windows will be many orders of magnitude
> worse..apples to apples that is..:)
>
> KF wrote:
>
> > good lord... is this a joke? They compare windows 2003 server to redhat
> > 6.0! Thats pretty damn close to apples and oranges. How about NT4.0 to
> > RH6.... thats a more level playing field? Even 2k3 vs. RH9 would be a
> > bit more on point. I fail to see how you can compare software that is 5
> > years old to something that was just released.
> >
> > "there were 17 critical vulnerabilities. For Windows Server 2003, there
> > were four. For Red Hat Linux 6, they were five to ten times higher."
> >
> > -KF
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >
>
> --
> May God Bless you and everything you touch.
>
> My "foundation" verse:
> Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and
> every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt
> condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their
> righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
	***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D.  Just don't touch anything.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ