full-disclosure - AW: Using anonymizers to masquerade P2P use?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200311122131.hACLVfQ21138@mailgate5.cinetic.de>
From: my_fd_list at web.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q? Timo=20Sch=F6ler ?=)
Subject: AW: Using anonymizers to masquerade P2P use?

wouldn't it be the same as using port redirection on the router (it's just manipulating the packets' port 
in its header)?

or am i wrong? (i'd be happy -- 'cos then the solution is easy ;)

> Did you try an "HTTP-wrapper"? Something like tcp2http?!? 
> 
> Stef
> 
>> hi list,
>> 
>> i just wonder whether it is technically possible to utilize one of those
>> anonymizers (like http:// anon.inf.tu-dresden.de, JAP; this one does not
>> allow other than 80/tcp and a few others) to hide use of P2P services?
>> 
>> i only know a few anonymizers, and the two of them i checked for this
>> possibility do not allow anything else than 80/tcp (ftp et al. are not
>> allowed 'due to risk of abuse' -- i wonder what prevent 80/tcp users of
>> misuse those services... ;). hm.
>> 
>> after that i thought i had an idea, using port redirection (done by the
>> routers i have access to), but that would only be a part (exactly one
>> half?!) of the story...
>> 
>> is there a way?
>> 
>> tia & regards,
>> 
>> [//eclipser]
______________________________________________________________________________
Horoskop, Comics, VIPs, Wetter, Sport und Lotto im WEB.DE Screensaver1.2
Kostenlos downloaden: http://screensaver.web.de/?mc=021110