full-disclosure - why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3FB325A7.2030801@egotistical.reprehensible.net>
From: ge at egotistical.reprehensible.net (Gadi Evron)
Subject: why commcerical software *could* be better [WAS: Re: 
 Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux]

I apologize if this somehow gets to the list twice, I accidentally 
posted it here with the wrong email address:

 > IMHO the open source crowd fixes bugs a magnitude faster than the m$ 
lusers - check www.guninski.com,
 >there are dates on which vendors were notified. Check the unpatched 
exploder page to get an idea.

As much as generally and usually I'd vigorously agree with you, there is 
a lot to be said for:
1. A serious (note serious) commercial company that has a crew working
    on addressing security concerns, and updating the product.
2. A commercial company providing with liability (and responsibility)
    for the software you use (in other words - tech support and someone
    to blame).
3. No source (!!) available for people to examine, thus making it, to a
    level, harder to locate security "holes" - for outsides in any case.

I can come up with a few more.. but basically all I am saying is, 
support open source, don't condemn commercial software. There is a 
difference between the two ideologies, and one should follow/support
whichever suits him/her best. Constructive vs. destructive attitudes?

Don't allow bad examples to cloud your better judgment.
:o)
-- 
       Gadi Evron (i.e. ge),
       ge@...uxbox.org.

The Trojan Horses Research mailing list - http://ecompute.org/th-list

My resume (Hebrew) - http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/resume.rtf

PGP key for ge@...uxbox.org -
http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron.asc
Note: this key is used mainly for files and attachments, I sign email 
messages using:
http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron_sign.asc