[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20031113135754.GB10891@gaesi.org>
From: lbruno at republico.estv.ipv.pt (Luis Bruno)
Subject: Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux
Gadi Evron wrote:
> there is a lot to be said for:
> 1. A serious (note serious) commercial company that has a crew working
> on addressing security concerns, and updating the product.
> 2. A commercial company providing with liability (and responsibility)
> for the software you use (in other words - someone to blame).
Your clients' safety is your own safety, and nobody was ever fired for
buying IBM either. But the accountability argument that goes with
$BIG_CORPORATION's name doesn't have any value. The EULA on your products
debunks the accountability myth.
--
Luis Bruno C8-H10-N4-O2-CH3-CH2-OH
UTM 29T 629481 E 4511776 N Alt: 576m
Powered by blists - more mailing lists