| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <019901c3aaf6$ed8cf2e0$1400000a@bigdog> From: bt at seifried.org (Kurt Seifried) Subject: Re: Serious flaws in bluetooth security lead to disclosure of personal data On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:38:50PM -0600, Schmehl, Paul L composed: > Bluetooth is *supposed* to be very short range - 10 meters is supposed > to be the maximum range. It is *not* 802.11b. It's 802.15.1. See > bluetooth.org for the details. Actually there are three classes of bluetooth: Class 3 with with 0 dBm (1 mW), 100M or so range (usually as a seperate dongle, not many devices have this capability built in as it eats batteries, however several "base station" products do it). Class 2 with 4 dBm (2.5 mW), 10M or so range (the "usuall" one) Class 1 with 20 dBm (100 mW) 10cm range (i.e. physically next to something). Oh wait. What happens if you get a really good antenna and radiate at a much higher power, hmmm... you can probably talk to bluetooth devices farther away... Sort of like 802.11. Plus you need to consider high volume enclosed spaces like elevators, turnstiles at subways, building entrances, hotel lobbies, airport lounges, etc. People are already slapping fake fronts/keypads/card readers onto ATM's to gather megnetic strip information and PIN numbers (allowing them to clone your card and raid your account), how hard would it be to build a battery powered bluetooth equivalent? Kurt Seifried, kurt@...fried.org A15B BEE5 B391 B9AD B0EF AEB0 AD63 0B4E AD56 E574 http://seifried.org/security/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists