lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: steve.wray at paradise.net.nz (Steve Wray)
Subject: SPAM and "undisclosed recipients"

[snip]
> Yeah, that's exactly what I needed to know.  I have about 5 email
> accounts that I regulary check, but some SPAM came in this way and was
> hard to determine which account it went to.  By checking the received
> header more carefully I was able to determine it.  When the 
> hell are we going to have a new RFC that eliminates the possibility of
SPAM and
> makes it secure by default?  Is it really that difficult?

Call me offtopic but I do think it is that difficult; Its
occured to me that detecting spam is a variation of the
Turing Test (Google for it).

Spammers are trying to produce emails that look as if they
were produced by a human being and not by some massively automated
system. 

Something like that.

> 
> Kris Hermansen
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists