full-disclosure - SPAM and "undisclosed recipients"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: steve.wray at paradise.net.nz (Steve Wray)
Subject: SPAM and "undisclosed recipients"

[snip]
> Yeah, that's exactly what I needed to know.  I have about 5 email
> accounts that I regulary check, but some SPAM came in this way and was
> hard to determine which account it went to.  By checking the received
> header more carefully I was able to determine it.  When the 
> hell are we going to have a new RFC that eliminates the possibility of
SPAM and
> makes it secure by default?  Is it really that difficult?

Call me offtopic but I do think it is that difficult; Its
occured to me that detecting spam is a variation of the
Turing Test (Google for it).

Spammers are trying to produce emails that look as if they
were produced by a human being and not by some massively automated
system. 

Something like that.

> 
> Kris Hermansen
>